<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gun Control &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/category/gun-control-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 11:44:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>SAF Files Reply Brief in Unlawful Search Lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/saf-files-reply-brief-in-unlawful-search-lawsuit.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/saf-files-reply-brief-in-unlawful-search-lawsuit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 11:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has filed a reply brief in a case challenging the unconstitutional search of an 18-year-old high school senior&#8217;s vehicle that was based solely on the knowledge that he is a legal gun owner. In October last year, SAF filed Harrington v. Crawford after Hillsboro-Deering High School student Jack Harrington&#8217;s vehicle was illegally searched while parked on school grounds. Harrington]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/saf-files-reply-brief-in-unlawful-search-lawsuit.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAF Announces Settlement in Major California Carry Rights Lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/saf-announces-settlement-in-major-california-carry-rights-lawsuit.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/saf-announces-settlement-in-major-california-carry-rights-lawsuit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 11:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners are pleased to announce a settlement resolving the remaining claims in California Rifle and Pistol Association v. LASD, SAF&#8217;s challenge to numerous Second Amendment infringements by the Los Angeles County Sheriff&#8217;s Department (LASD). The settlement follows LASD&#8217;s representation that it is now processing concealed carry weapon (CCW) permit applications within the 120-day period]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/saf-announces-settlement-in-major-california-carry-rights-lawsuit.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FPC Moves to Block California&#8217;s &#8220;Glock Ban&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/fpc-moves-to-block-californias-glock-ban.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/fpc-moves-to-block-californias-glock-ban.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72396</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) filed a motion for preliminary injunction in Renna v. Bonta, a Second Amendment lawsuit challenging California&#8217;s handgun bans, including the State&#8217;s &#8220;Roster&#8221; ban, microstamping ban, and ban on semiautomatic handguns with cruciform trigger bars (including nearly every Glock and Glock-style pistol on the market). Today&#8217;s motion is limited to the cruciform trigger bar ban; FPC&#8217;s district court preliminary injunction victory against]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/fpc-moves-to-block-californias-glock-ban.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge: Short-Barreled Rifle, Suppressor NFA Registration Scheme Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/judge-short-barreled-rifle-suppressor-nfa-registration-scheme-unconstitutional.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/judge-short-barreled-rifle-suppressor-nfa-registration-scheme-unconstitutional.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas has ruled that the remaining registration scheme for short-barreled rifles and suppressors in the National Firearms Act (NFA) is unconstitutional in Jensen v. ATF, a case supported by the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF). Since 1934, the NFA required anyone who wished to purchase certain classes of firearms, including silencers and]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/judge-short-barreled-rifle-suppressor-nfa-registration-scheme-unconstitutional.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAF Submits Series of Comment Letters on ATF Proposed Rules</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/saf-submits-series-of-comment-letters-on-atf-proposed-rules.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/saf-submits-series-of-comment-letters-on-atf-proposed-rules.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 11:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) submitted a series of formal comment letters to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) on multiple proposed rules, urging the agency to modernize regulations in ways that better respect the Second Amendment, gun-owner privacy and the right to interstate travel with firearms. In late April, SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut was on]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/08/saf-submits-series-of-comment-letters-on-atf-proposed-rules.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAF Urges Maryland Supreme Court to Review Interstate Carry Rights Lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/saf-urges-maryland-supreme-court-to-review-interstate-carry-rights-lawsuit.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/saf-urges-maryland-supreme-court-to-review-interstate-carry-rights-lawsuit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BELLEVUE, Wash. — The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) filed an amicus brief today in the Supreme Court of Maryland supporting the petition for certiorari in Darius Duvall v. State of Maryland, challenging the state&#8217;s refusal to recognize valid, out-of-state carry permits. The brief urges the Court to grant review and hold that Maryland&#8217;s refusal to recognize these permits violates the Second Amendment. American]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/saf-urges-maryland-supreme-court-to-review-interstate-carry-rights-lawsuit.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FPC Sues Louisiana to End Unconstitutional Age-Based Carry Ban</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/fpc-sues-louisiana-to-end-unconstitutional-age-based-carry-ban.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/fpc-sues-louisiana-to-end-unconstitutional-age-based-carry-ban.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) filed a new federal Second Amendment lawsuit challenging Louisiana&#8217;s unconstitutional prohibition on issuing handgun carry permits to peaceable adults under 21. The case, Pool v. Hodges, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. FPC also filed a motion for summary judgment seeking a prompt final judgment against the unconstitutional ban. Federal]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/fpc-sues-louisiana-to-end-unconstitutional-age-based-carry-ban.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAF Files Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Maryland Glock Ban Case</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/saf-files-motion-for-preliminary-injunction-in-maryland-glock-ban-case.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/saf-files-motion-for-preliminary-injunction-in-maryland-glock-ban-case.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners have filed a motion for preliminary injunction in Bathras v. Moore, SAF&#8217;s challenge to the Maryland Glock ban signed into law by Gov. Wes Moore. In May, SAF filed the lawsuit immediately after Gov. Moore signed into law Senate Bill 334, which states a person &#8220;…may not manufacture, sell, offer for sale, purchase, receive, or]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/saf-files-motion-for-preliminary-injunction-in-maryland-glock-ban-case.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third Circuit Strikes Down New Jersey &#8216;Assault Weapons&#8217; Ban, Bolstering SAF&#8217;s Cases Before the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/third-circuit-strikes-down-new-jersey-assault-weapons-ban-bolstering-safs-cases-before-the-supreme-court.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/third-circuit-strikes-down-new-jersey-assault-weapons-ban-bolstering-safs-cases-before-the-supreme-court.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down New Jersey&#8217;s assault weapon and magazine capacity bans, bolstering a positive outcome in the Second Amendment Foundation&#8217;s (SAF) two assault weapons ban cases currently before the Supreme Court. &#8220;Today&#8217;s Third Circuit decision striking down New Jersey&#8217;s so-called &#8216;assault weapons&#8217; ban confirms arguments in SAF&#8217;s two cases before the Supreme Court – Viramontesv. Cook County and Grant]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/third-circuit-strikes-down-new-jersey-assault-weapons-ban-bolstering-safs-cases-before-the-supreme-court.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump DOJ Abandons Appeal of FPC Post Office Gun Ban Victory</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/trump-doj-abandons-appeal-of-fpc-post-office-gun-ban-victory.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/trump-doj-abandons-appeal-of-fpc-post-office-gun-ban-victory.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that the Trump Department of Justice moved to voluntarily dismiss its appeal of FPC&#8217;s victory against the federal post office gun ban in FPC v. Blanche—formerly FPC v. Bondi. If the Fifth Circuit grants the unopposed motion, the district court&#8217;s permanent injunction will remain in place unchanged. The plaintiffs, which include FPC, two FPC members, and the Second Amendment Foundation, are represented by]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/07/trump-doj-abandons-appeal-of-fpc-post-office-gun-ban-victory.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
