<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gun Control &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/category/gun-control-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:39:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>FPC Moves Forward in Lawsuit to Strike Down National Firearms Act</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-moves-forward-in-lawsuit-to-strike-down-national-firearms-act.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-moves-forward-in-lawsuit-to-strike-down-national-firearms-act.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#160; A reply brief in support of the plaintiffs&#8217; motion for summary judgment was filed in Roberts v. ATF, an FPC-backed challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934. Plaintiffs in the case include T.J. Roberts, Zachary Cockrell, Meridian Ordnance, Buckeye Firearms Association, Center for Human Liberty, Jews for the Preservation of Firearm Ownership, and American Suppressor Association Foundation. The plaintiffs are represented]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-moves-forward-in-lawsuit-to-strike-down-national-firearms-act.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FPC Fights Trump DOJ Effort to Gut Landmark Second Amendment Victory</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-fights-trump-doj-effort-to-gut-landmark-second-amendment-victory.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-fights-trump-doj-effort-to-gut-landmark-second-amendment-victory.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 11:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) filed its opening brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Reese v. ATF, challenging the district court&#8217;s denial of complete relief after FPC prevailed against the federal age-based handgun and ammunition purchase ban. The plaintiffs include FPC, the Second Amendment Foundation, and the Louisiana Shooting Association. The plaintiffs are represented by David H. Thompson, Peter A.]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-fights-trump-doj-effort-to-gut-landmark-second-amendment-victory.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FPC Files Reply Brief in Lawsuit Challenging Illegal Savannah, Ga. Gun Control Law</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-files-reply-brief-in-lawsuit-challenging-illegal-savannah-ga-gun-control-law.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-files-reply-brief-in-lawsuit-challenging-illegal-savannah-ga-gun-control-law.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 11:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) filed a reply in support of its motion for summary judgment in Morris v. Savannah, its lawsuit challenging a City of Savannah, Georgia firearm storage ordinance that is patently unlawful under the State&#8217;s comprehensive firearm preemption law. FPC is joined in the litigation by Deacon Morris, an FPC member. The plaintiffs are represented by attorney John]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-files-reply-brief-in-lawsuit-challenging-illegal-savannah-ga-gun-control-law.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FPC Applauds Supreme Court Decision on Federal Marijuana Gun Ban</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-applauds-supreme-court-decision-on-federal-marijuana-gun-ban.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-applauds-supreme-court-decision-on-federal-marijuana-gun-ban.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The United States Supreme Court today issued a decision in United States v. Hemani, unanimously holding that the federal ban on gun possession by &#8220;unlawful&#8221; users of controlled substances (such as marijuana) violates the right to keep and bear arms protected by the Second Amendment as applied to Mr. Hemani. The Court&#8217;s opinion for Hemani was written by Justice Gorsuch. Concurring opinions were written by]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-applauds-supreme-court-decision-on-federal-marijuana-gun-ban.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAF Files Lawsuit Challenging California Contra Costa County&#8217;s Carry Bans</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/saf-files-lawsuit-challenging-california-contra-costa-countys-carry-bans.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/saf-files-lawsuit-challenging-california-contra-costa-countys-carry-bans.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has filed a federal lawsuit in California challenging Contra Costa County Sheriff&#8217;s Office policies that prohibit permit holders from carrying handguns equipped with red dot sights or flashlights, as well as their outright ban on the carry of single action only (SAO) 1911- and 2011-style pistols. The policies, enforced by Sheriff David Livingston, are unique in the]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/saf-files-lawsuit-challenging-california-contra-costa-countys-carry-bans.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOA and GOF Petition the Virginia Supreme Court for a Preliminary Ruling on Virginia&#8217;s Looming &#8220;Assault Firearms&#8221; Ban</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/goa-and-gof-petition-the-virginia-supreme-court-for-a-preliminary-ruling-on-virginias-looming-assault-firearms-ban.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/goa-and-gof-petition-the-virginia-supreme-court-for-a-preliminary-ruling-on-virginias-looming-assault-firearms-ban.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 11:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gun Owners of America (GOA) and Gun Owners Foundation (GOF), alongside Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL) and 2A journalist John Crump, have petitioned the Virginia Supreme Court for an urgent ruling in their lawsuit challenging Virginia&#8217;s upcoming ban on &#8220;assault firearms&#8221; and &#8220;large capacity ammunition feeding devices.&#8221; The petition requests that a decision be made on the plaintiffs&#8217; pending motion for temporary]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/goa-and-gof-petition-the-virginia-supreme-court-for-a-preliminary-ruling-on-virginias-looming-assault-firearms-ban.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FPC Launches Fifth Circuit Appeal Challenging Unconstitutional Texas Carry Bans</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-launches-fifth-circuit-appeal-challenging-unconstitutional-texas-carry-bans.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-launches-fifth-circuit-appeal-challenging-unconstitutional-texas-carry-bans.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 11:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=72019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) filed its opening brief with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Ziegenfuss v. Martin, challenging Texas&#8217;s carry bans in numerous ordinary public places following the district court&#8217;s misguided opinion upholding the bans. The plaintiffs include FPC and FPC members. The plaintiffs are represented by Bradley A. Benbrook, Stephen M. Duvernay, and Jamie G. McWilliam of Benbrook Law Group, P.C. as]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-launches-fifth-circuit-appeal-challenging-unconstitutional-texas-carry-bans.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FPC Sues Los Angeles, Inglewood Over Unconstitutional Handgun Rationing Laws</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-sues-los-angeles-inglewood-over-unconstitutional-handgun-rationing-laws.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-sues-los-angeles-inglewood-over-unconstitutional-handgun-rationing-laws.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 20:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=71942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) filed a new federal lawsuit, Lopez v. Los Angeles, challenging local laws in the California cities of Los Angeles and Inglewood that prohibit any person from purchasing more than one handgun in any 30-day period. The plaintiffs challenging the local laws include FPC, an FPC member, and the California Gun Rights Foundation. The plaintiffs are represented by Chad Flores]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/06/fpc-sues-los-angeles-inglewood-over-unconstitutional-handgun-rationing-laws.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCRKBA Applauds Four VA Prosecutors for Refusing to Enforce Gun Ban</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/05/ccrkba-applauds-four-va-prosecutors-for-refusing-to-enforce-gun-ban.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/05/ccrkba-applauds-four-va-prosecutors-for-refusing-to-enforce-gun-ban.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 12:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=71890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is applauding the decision by at least four county prosecutors in Virginia to not enforce the ban on so-called &#8220;assault firearms&#8221; and original capacity magazines, signed into law by Democrat Gov. Abigail Spanberger Prosecutors in Powhatan, Pulaski, Smyth and Spotsylvania counties say the ban violates the Second Amendment. Those]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/05/ccrkba-applauds-four-va-prosecutors-for-refusing-to-enforce-gun-ban.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAF Files Lawsuit Challenging Newly Signed Maryland Glock Ban</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/05/saf-files-lawsuit-challenging-newly-signed-maryland-glock-ban.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/05/saf-files-lawsuit-challenging-newly-signed-maryland-glock-ban.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 12:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=71879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners have filed a lawsuit challenging Maryland&#8217;s newly signed Glock ban. The filing comes in immediate response to Gov. Wes Moore signing the bill into law today. Gov. Moore signed into law Senate Bill 334, which states a person &#8220;…may not manufacture, sell, offer for sale, purchase, receive, or transfer a machine gun convertible pistol.&#8221;]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2026/05/saf-files-lawsuit-challenging-newly-signed-maryland-glock-ban.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
