<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AP &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/ap/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Associated Press Clouds the Gun Debate with  Its Ignorance</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/12/associated-press-clouds-the-gun-debate-with-its-ignorance.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/12/associated-press-clouds-the-gun-debate-with-its-ignorance.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandy hook]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=7250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Glen Wunderlich There are so many opinions about &#8220;doing something&#8221; about guns, I&#8217;ve purposely avoided comment to date.  But, after reading an AP piece, it&#8217;s easy to see why people become confused. It begins by stating that the previous &#8220;assault weapons&#8221; ban was considered imperfect by many.  Then it starts the misinformation indicating that if the ban had been]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/12/associated-press-clouds-the-gun-debate-with-its-ignorance.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
