<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>charitywatch &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/charitywatch/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:36:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>HSUS Gets Low Marks &#8211; Still</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/04/hsus-gets-low-marks-still.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american institute of philanthropy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charitywatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogs and cats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsus]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=4480</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The April/May charity guide of the American Institute of Philanthropy/CharityWatch is out—and HSUS once again earns an “unsatisfactory&#8221; grade of “D.” Even PETA isn’t that low (C+). HSUS has now earned a “D” grade for almost two years. CharityWatch finds that HSUS spends as little as 50 percent of its budget on actual programs—meaning up to half of HSUS’s budget]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HSUS Gets a D from Charity Watch</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2011/11/hsus-gets-a-d-from-charity-watch.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal rights group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charitywatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humane society]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=2674</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HSUS’s Report Card: D Here is the latest charity rating guide from CharityWatch (formerly the American Institute of Philanthropy). And once again, the Humane Society of the United States—a national animal-rights group, not a pet-sheltering organization—gets a “D” grade. CharityWatch finds that HSUS spends as little as 49 percent of its budget on actual program costs, meaning the rest is overhead]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
