<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>gun ban &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/gun-ban/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Effects of Australia&#8217;s Gun Ban</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/12/the-effects-of-australias-gun-ban.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=7313</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Australia&#8217;s Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research acknowledges that the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime: In 2006, assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent. Sexual assault &#8212; Australia&#8217;s equivalent term for rape &#8212; increased 29.9 percent. Overall, Australia&#8217;s violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent. Moreover, Australia and the United States &#8212; where]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feinstein IS Coming for Your Guns</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/12/feinstein-is-coming-for-your-guns.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semi-automatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=7307</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)—author of the federal “assault weapon” and “large” ammunition magazine ban of 1994-2004—has announced that on the first day of the new Congress—January 3rd— she will introduce a bill to which her 1994 ban will pale by comparison. On Dec. 17th, Feinstein said, “I have been working with my staff for over a year on this legislation”]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Battle is Not Coming&#8211;It is Here!  You Must Remain Engaged!</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/12/the-battle-is-not-coming-it-is-here-you-must-remain-engaged.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assault Weapons and Semi-Autos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Carolyn McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. Frank Lautenberg]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=7267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NRA initially withheld comment about the horrible crime that took place in Newtown, Connecticut last week, out of respect for the families of the crime&#8217;s victims and other residents of that community, and while law enforcement officials there conducted their investigation.  However, President Obama and a usual cast of characters, in keeping with their longstanding practice of not letting any]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Associated Press Clouds the Gun Debate with  Its Ignorance</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/12/associated-press-clouds-the-gun-debate-with-its-ignorance.html</link>
					<comments>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/12/associated-press-clouds-the-gun-debate-with-its-ignorance.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandy hook]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=7250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Glen Wunderlich There are so many opinions about &#8220;doing something&#8221; about guns, I&#8217;ve purposely avoided comment to date.  But, after reading an AP piece, it&#8217;s easy to see why people become confused. It begins by stating that the previous &#8220;assault weapons&#8221; ban was considered imperfect by many.  Then it starts the misinformation indicating that if the ban had been]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/12/associated-press-clouds-the-gun-debate-with-its-ignorance.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disinformation Continues as U.N. Arms Treaty Takes Shape</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/07/disinformation-continues-as-u-n-arms-treaty-takes-shape.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=5898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In New York this week, the U.N. Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty continued trying to draft a treaty to impose worldwide controls on small arms, including civilian-owned firearms. The NRA has made clear its opposition to any treaty that includes civilian firearms, and continues to note that a majority of the United States Senate stands with American gun owners]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Strikes Down North Carolina Emergency Powers Gun Ban</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/03/court-strikes-down-north-carolina-emergency-powers-gun-ban.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alan m gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second amendment foundation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=4261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BELLEVUE, WA &#8211; A federal district court judge in North Carolina has just struck down that state&#8217;s emergency power to impose a ban on firearms and ammunition outside the home during a declared emergency, ruling that the provision violates the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The case, Bateman v. Purdue, was brought by the Second Amendment Foundation, Grass]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Lott on the Second Amendment</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/03/john-lott-on-the-second-amendment.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john lott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington dc]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=3882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some insightful perspectives on crime in D.C. before and after the gun ban and the Heller decision.  Chicago never went back to the &#8220;Old West&#8221; days, as had been predicted.  The facts are here&#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
