<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>handgun possession &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/handgun-possession/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Courts Split on Right to Carry Firearms Outside the Home</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/03/courts-split-on-right-to-carry-firearms-outside-the-home.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handgun possession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self defense]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=4126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This from the NRA: Unquestionably the hottest issue in Second Amendment litigation today is whether the Second Amendment protects a right to carry firearms outside the home for personal protection—and if so, what might be the limits on that right. Until recently, far too many courts have wrongly claimed that because the Supreme Court’s decisions in District of Columbia v.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
