<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hunting wolves &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/hunting-wolves/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2021 09:50:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Wolf Management Needs Hunters</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2021/01/wolf-management-needs-hunters.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2021 09:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangered species act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulated hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolf Recovery Goals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thinkingafield.org/?p=35515</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Glen Wunderlich Charter Member Professional Outdoor Media Association (POMA) The headline read as follows:  “Groups ask court to restore protections for gray wolves.”  The unsigned piece began with “Wildlife advocates asked a federal court to overturn a decision that stripped ESA protections.”  Oh, no!  And, to make matters even more threatening, language followed by indicating the toxic Trump administration]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan Wolves by the Numbers</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/11/michigan-wolves-by-the-numbers.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 10:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fund for animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gray wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gray wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting wolves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper Peninsual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolves]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=6860</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By   Glen Wunderlich We’ve got wolves &#8211; plenty of them but that all depends on who is being asked.  The DNR’s goal is to ensure the wolf population remains viable and above a level (about 200 wolves) that would require either federal or state reclassification as a threatened or endangered species. On the other hand, on October 15th, the Humane Society]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
