<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>shotgun zone &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/shotgun-zone/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Michigan HB 5249 Falls Short of Meaningful Change in Firearms for Shotgun Zone</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/01/michigan-hb-5249-falls-short-of-meaningful-change-in-firearms-for-shotgun-zone.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handgun cartridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slug guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straight wall cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zone III]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=3437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Glen Wunderlich When Michigan House Bill 5249 was proposed, this month by Representative Matthew Lori (R) District 59, it appeared as though Michigan’s Zone III (shotgun zone) deer hunters would be allowed a viable alternative to shotguns, muzzleloaders, and handguns. (This is a repeat of an identical proposal by Rep. Green in October of 2011 that went nowhere.) For]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Centerfire Rifles for Shotgun Zone?  Not so fast&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/01/centerfire-rifles-for-shotgun-zone-not-so-fast.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sb 775]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straight-walled case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zone III]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=3389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Glen Wunderlich When Michigan Senate Bill 775 was proposed by Senator Mike Green (R) of District 31 this past October, it appeared as though Michigan’s Zone III (shotgun zone) deer hunters would be allowed a viable alternative to shotguns, muzzleloaders, and handguns. For years, I have wondered why straight-walled cartridges were not allowed in rifle configurations, as opposed to]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Centerfire Rifles for Michigan&#8217;s Shotgun Zone?</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/01/centerfire-rifles-for-michigans-shotgun-zone.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sb 775]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun zone]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=3350</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Glen Wunderlich Michigan Senate bill 775 has been introduced to allow the following cartridges to be used in our Zone III for deer:  A .35 caliber or larger rifle loaded with straight-walled cartridges with a minimum case length of 1.16 inches and a maximum case length of 1.80 inches. That&#8217;s a very small minimum to maximum amount and would]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
