<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tasers &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/tasers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:42:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Taser, Stun Gun Legislation Moves Forward in Michigan</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/04/taser-stun-gun-legislation-moves-forward-in-michigan.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stun gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tasers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=4651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Michigan Senate bills 29 and 30 would allow a CPL holder to use a stun gun, and authorizes reserve peace officers for its use during the performance of official duties and allows court officers to carry a concealed pistol or stun gun in a no-carry zone.  The bills have cleared the House of Representatives and now return to the Senate for]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Stun Guns in Michigan</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2011/12/on-stun-guns-in-michigan.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stun guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tasers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=3089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A pending bill in Lansing would allow the use of stun guns, or Tasers, if you will, by those licensed to carry concealed pistols.  It makes sense, and whoever wrote the attached opinion in the Lansing State Journal thinks so too.  Here is the editorial&#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tasers and Stun Guns May Become Legal in Michigan</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2011/10/tasers-and-stun-guns-may-become-legal-in-michigan.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stun guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tasers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=2261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Michigan residents with permits to carry concealed pistols also could carry stun guns or Tasers under a measure approved 35-3 on Tuesday by the state Senate. The measure now goes to the House. Under the Senate legislation, laws that cover the use and licensing of concealed handguns also would apply to stun guns or Tasers. That includes certain no-carry zones]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
