<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>universal background checks &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/universal-background-checks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>FFL Retailers Overwhelmingly Oppose &#8216;Universal Background Checks&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2013/03/ffl-retailers-overwhelmingly-oppose-universal-background-checks.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nssf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal background checks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=8126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NEWTOWN, Conn. &#8212; An online survey of federally licensed firearms retailers conducted this week by the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the trade association for the firearms industry, reveals that those who would be on the front line of implementing what is touted as &#8220;universal background checks&#8221; have serious concerns both about whether such proposals would work as well as]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
