<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Washington D.C. &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/washington-d-c/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:46:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>D.C. Changes Stance on Handguns</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/04/d-c-changes-stance-on-handguns.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metropolitan police department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=4538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[After years of end-runs around the historic decision of Washington D.C. v Heller, some needed changes are coming to its handgun laws.  A five-hour training mandate, ballistics testing, vision testing and the requirement that application documents be notarized are no longer required. The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) will take photographs of applicants. Registered gun owners will no longer be subject to arrest,]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C.&#8217;s Stance on Guns Changing</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/04/d-c-s-stance-on-guns-changing.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=4509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The D.C. Council is expected to have passed the Firearms Amendment Act of 2012 under expedited procedures so it can take effect this summer. The ordinance will do away with many of the expensive and time-consuming hurdles to registering a gun in the District that were put in place after the Supreme court’s decision. D.C. Council Chairman Kwame R. Brown, who will]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C.&#8217;s Gun Laws Too Strict</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/01/d-c-s-gun-laws-too-strict.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=3376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[American citizens shouldn&#8217;t have to take a test or pay onerous fees to exercise their rights to free speech and to vote. It’s equally as disturbing to set such roadblocks before the Second Amendment. D.C. may finally be realizing that its obstructionist intent to stiffle rights may be costing it too much.  More here&#8230;]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
