<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>yearlings &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/yearlings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Michigan Deer Management Needs to be Changed</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/02/michigan-deer-management-need-to-be-changed.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antlerless deer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qdma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality deer management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality deer management association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitetail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yearling bucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yearlings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=3644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Glen Wunderlich An interesting analysis of this past deer hunting season has been released by the Quality Deer Management Association (QDMA). Contained in it are comparisons from 36 states in our eastern half of the country. It’s time to assess how Michigan’s deer management stacks up with our neighbors. QDMA’s 2012 Whitetail Report shows that the majority of hunters]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDNR Statistics on Deer Kill in Southern Michigan</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/01/mdnr-statistics-on-deer-kill-in-southern-michigan.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deer hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yearlings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=3441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MDNR Deer Harvest Reports from the Southern Lower Peninsula  (2007-2010) which indicated that … 64% of the antlered deer harvested was comprised of 1.5 year old bucks 75% of all 1.5 year old bucks killed , had 6 or fewer total points (avg. 3/side) 40% of all 1.5 year old bucks killed, had 4 or less total points (avg. 2/side)]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
