<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Zone III &#8211; ThinkingAfield.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thinkingafield.org/tag/zone-iii/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thinkingafield.org</link>
	<description>Outdoor commentary and legislative issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 23:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Meeting on Proposed Southern Michigan Deer Antler Point Restrictions</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2013/05/meeting-on-proposed-southern-michigan-deer-antler-point-restrictions.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 15:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antler point restriction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deer hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michigan deer hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southern zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitetail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zone III]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=8831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GW:  This is the first I&#8217;ve heard about this proposal.  Sounds good! The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) today advised the public that a local organization will hold an informational meeting regarding a proposed deer antler point restriction (APR) on June 4 at the East Lansing High School. A group known as the Lower Peninsula Deer Management Initiative (LPDMI)]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Straight-Wall Rifle Cartridges in Zone III This Year</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/12/no-straight-wall-rifle-cartridges-in-zone-iii-this-year.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill 5249]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straight wall cartridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zone III]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=7110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Glen Wunderlich After having the chance to participate in the legislative process on behalf of House Bill 5249 and giving testimony in its support, I really thought the bill would pass this year.  Being able to use straight-wall cartridges in rifles in the southern &#8220;shotgun&#8221; zone seemed to be a  no-brainer.  I know I am with thousands of ethical sportsmen]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan HB 5249 Falls Short of Meaningful Change in Firearms for Shotgun Zone</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/01/michigan-hb-5249-falls-short-of-meaningful-change-in-firearms-for-shotgun-zone.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handgun cartridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotguns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slug guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straight wall cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zone III]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=3437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Glen Wunderlich When Michigan House Bill 5249 was proposed, this month by Representative Matthew Lori (R) District 59, it appeared as though Michigan’s Zone III (shotgun zone) deer hunters would be allowed a viable alternative to shotguns, muzzleloaders, and handguns. (This is a repeat of an identical proposal by Rep. Green in October of 2011 that went nowhere.) For]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Centerfire Rifles for Shotgun Zone?  Not so fast&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://thinkingafield.org/2012/01/centerfire-rifles-for-shotgun-zone-not-so-fast.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sb 775]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[straight-walled case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zone III]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkingafield.org/?p=3389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Glen Wunderlich When Michigan Senate Bill 775 was proposed by Senator Mike Green (R) of District 31 this past October, it appeared as though Michigan’s Zone III (shotgun zone) deer hunters would be allowed a viable alternative to shotguns, muzzleloaders, and handguns. For years, I have wondered why straight-walled cartridges were not allowed in rifle configurations, as opposed to]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
