New Tactacam 4.0

Caledonia, MN- Tactacam is unlike any other camera on the market. It is designed by hunters for hunters with one goal, sharing the excitement and enjoyment of your hunt. From the launch of our very first Tactacam 2.0 we have listened to the feedback and went back to the drawing board with high expectations and we feel we have exceeded them.  The all new Tactacam 4.0 is packed full of features like Wi-Fi compatible viewing and control via your smartphone, battery indicator and the ability to film in 3 different resolution settings. The ultra-sharp lens and low light recording brings your target 5X closer than other POV cameras on the market making the Tactacam 4.0 the ultimate weapon mounted camera.   MSRP $329.99

Product Features Read more

Zinke Announces More than $1.1 Billion for Sportsmen and Conservation

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

This year marks $20 billion in hunter and angler conservation funding

HORICON, WI – Yesterday U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke traveled to Horicon, Wisconsin, where he announced more than $1.1 billion in annual national funding for state wildlife agencies from revenues generated by the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration and Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration (PRDJ) acts. The Secretary presented a ceremonial check to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for $34,966,603 while visiting the Horicon Marsh State Wildlife Area. State-by-state listings of the final Fiscal Year 2018 apportionments of Wildlife Restoration Program fund can be found here and the Sport Fish Restoration Program fund here. Allocations of the funds are authorized by Congress. To date, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has distributed more than $20.2 billion in apportionments for state conservation and recreation projects.

“American sportsmen and women are some of our best conservationists and they contribute billions of dollars toward wildlife conservation and sportsmen access every year through the Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson Acts,” said Secretary Zinke. “For nearly eighty years, states have been able to fund important conservation initiatives thanks to the more than $20 billion that has generated nationwide. Every time a firearm, fishing pole, hook, bullet, motor boat or boat fuel is sold, part of that cost goes to fund conservation. The best way to increase funding for conservation and sportsmen access is to increase the number of hunters and anglers in our woods and waters. The American conservation model has been replicated all over the world because it works.” Read more

Doing Damage Defined in Michigan

By Glen Wunderlich

As a wordsmith and professional communicator, I can’t help but notice when the English language is used incorrectly.  For example, if you’ve ever watched and/or listened to political debates, invariably you’ll notice an indefensible misuse of the word “podium.”  Some smartly dressed talking head displays his or her ignorance with a comment such as this:  “Senator Sam is now getting behind the podium, so let’s listen.”  Students of our language cringe, knowing that Sam is actually getting behind the lectern.  The podium – if it’s even present – is the platform on which the lectern is placed.  It baffles me as to why the higher-ups never seem to catch on but at least that’s off my chest now. 

For some time, language in Michigan’s Hunting Digest has seemed ambiguous to me relative to certain rules governing coyote hunting and trapping.  The rules indicate, there is no limit, coyotes can be hunted statewide, year-round.  However, reference to note #1 indicates coyotes may be taken on private property by a property owner or designee all year, if they are doing or about to do damage on private property.  A license or written permit is not needed. 

Not wanting to get on the wrong side of the law, I contacted Rebecca Benedict of the Public Outreach and Engagement Unit, DNR Wildlife Division.  I asked if damage to other wildlife, such as deer, would qualify under the definition.  Furthermore, how’s a person to know if a coyote is about to do damage? 

Here is her response:  “Coyotes that pursue natural prey such as deer and small game are not considered to be doing or about to do damage. The coyote must be doing or about to do damage to your personal property (pets, livestock, privately owned cervids, private buildings, etc.) to be able to be lawfully taken outside of the trapping season.  

Raccoons, skunks, and coyotes may be taken year-round, using otherwise lawful hunting or trapping methods, on private property and with landowner permission when doing or about to do damage. A snare would be lawful year-round to take coyotes doing or about to do damage on your private property as long as the rules outlined in the Michigan Hunting and Trapping Digest are followed; see page 50 for more information. 

If questioned by a law enforcement officer, you would need to provide an explanation of how the coyote was doing or about to do damage. Contact the Law Enforcement Division at 517-284-6000 for more information. ” 

Still confused, I asked how a coyote could be shot on sight without all this proof.  The simple answer follows:   

A Michigan resident may hunt coyote year-round if they have a Base License.   Coyotes are in the category of small game, so you can use your base license to hunt them.  You must follow the rules for hunting coyotes, same as you have rules for any other game species you hunt, like deer.  You can find more information on hunting coyotes in the Hunting and Trapping Digest on pg. 48 & 49.  Coyotes do not have to be doing or about to damage to be hunted.   

The rule you are referring to allows a property owner (or someone designated by the property owner) to take coyote on private property if they are doing or about to do damage without a license or written permit.  This would not be hunting.  For example: if  on your property you see a coyote going toward your chicken coop you would be able to shoot it if you did not have a base license.  (Please check and make sure you are in an area where you can legally discharge a firearm).   

I hope this clears up the confusion.” 

It certainly did and I hope we can all sleep better now.

RMEF Supports Inaugural Wisconsin Elk Hunt

MISSOULA, Mont.—The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation congratulates the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) on its decision to institute Wisconsin’s first-ever managed elk hunt later this year.

“This is the culmination of more than two decades of elk-related conservation work,” said Blake Henning, RMEF chief conservation officer. “RMEF has been involved with reintroduction efforts in Wisconsin dating back to 1995 and continues to put funds on the ground to benefit the state’s elk herds and elk habitat.”

The DNR will provide ten bull-only tags for the fall of 2018 within the Clam Lake elk range in north-central Wisconsin. The state’s southern elk range in Jackson County will not be a part of the hunt.

One of the tags will go to a resident via a RMEF raffle designed to generate revenue for elk habitat management, research and monitoring. Read more

Turkey Tips

By Glen Wunderlich

The sights and sounds of spring are upon us, no matter what Punxsutawney Phil has indicated.  Back are the sandhill cranes, redwing blackbirds and others such as the robins – all of which must wonder the efficacy of the early-bird adage of getting the proverbial worm.  No doubt Old Man Winter’s not done with us yet.

Regardless, some of our most resilient, non-migratory game birds – the wild turkeys – are just as anxious to bid farewell to the persistent snow, as they get in gear for their annual mating rituals in the coming weeks.  It’s easy for us humans to forget, as we man the snow shovels week after week, but the early spring hunting season begins in about a month – ready or not.

Here are a few suggestions to pass the time for those with visions of drumsticks dancing in their heads.

·        There are about as many turkey calls as turkey hunters themselves and now’s the time to see how they’ve held up.  Box calls may need a bit of light sanding on the friction surfaces, along with some chalking to finish the job.  Pot calls such as slate or glass may need similar attention such as light sanding of the surfaces including that of the striker.  Diaphragm calls can get funky, too, and rather than mess with old ones, they’re inexpensive enough to simply replace; just don’t forget to sing a few practice tunes with them before heading afield.

·        Check the function of shotguns – especially if they’ve seen use from last season during upland game or wildfowl seasons.

·        Patterning the smoothbores should also be on the checklist.  Most turkey loads pack a wallop at both ends – downrange and squarely on the shoulder.  Consider using light target shells, if you are concerned about your point of aim; they are inexpensive and are less likely to produce the dreaded flinch.  Once you get on target, it’s time for the serious stuff.

·        If you’ve yet to select any particular brand of shotshells, I’ve yet to find a better one for the money than Winchester’s Long Beard XR shells.  They come in 12 and 20-gauge configurations and pattern better than shells costing much more.  Although XR stands for extended range, make sure to limit shots to a distance whereby the pattern is tight enough to produce about 10 pellets in the head and neck region of the turkey.  If you don’t have store-bought turkey targets, make your own.

·        Camo gloves, facemasks and insect repellant should be packed.  Forgetting any one of these essentials can spoil a hunt.

·        Decoys are big business but they don’t have to be expensive.  I’ve had the same old rubber hen for years and that’s all I’ve ever used.  Although many decoying theories prevail, I’ve never found any need for elaborate setups.  But, if you are a run-and-gun hunter, a turkey fan-tail decoy can provide cover and deception.

·        Finally, if you are taking a youngster along, strongly consider a portable blind.  It can keep hunters dry, while concealing inevitable movement from within.  And, unlike whitetail deer, turkeys pay no attention to them – even if you’ve set them up immediately before turkeys are present.

Secretary Zinke Partners with Congress on Bipartisan Bill to Fix National Parks

WASHINGTON – Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke joined U.S. Senators Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Angus King (I-ME), Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID), Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-OR) and others to introduce a bipartisan bill to rebuild America’s National Parks.

The proposed bill would use up to $18 billion in revenue derived from energy produced on federal lands and waters to establish a special fund within the Treasury specifically for “National Park Restoration”. The bill follows the blueprint laid out in Secretary Zinke and President Trump’s budget proposal, the Public Lands Infrastructure Fund. The Alexander/King bill’s cosponsors are: Senators Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Steve Daines (R-MT), Cory Gardner (R-CO), and Thom Tillis (R-NC). This bill fulfills one of the priorities laid out in President Trump’s legislative framework for rebuilding America’s infrastructure.

“Infrastructure is an investment, not merely an expense. And every dollar we put in to rebuilding our parks, will help bolster the gateway communities that rely on park visitation for economic vitality. Read more

FOXPRO TurkeyPro

The FOXPRO TurkeyPro gives you the ultimate advantage while chasing down that elusive ol’ tom. The unit comes with 16 turkey sounds, 19 predator sounds, and holds 300 sounds total. The TurkeyPro uses a single, high-efficiency Mylar cone speaker. Connect an external speaker to the jack on the side of the call for even more volume. In turkey hunting, it is common for that gobbler to hang up on you.  Additional TurkeyPros can be placed strategically behind you to coax that gobbler into your range.  The system controls up to 3 TurkeyPro units from one remote for directional advantage.

The TurkeyPro remote features an elastomeric keypad for effortless use, even with gloves. It also has category files for easy navigation through sounds. The remote has a power on/off switch, volume up/down buttons, scroll up/down buttons, a mute, and much more. Read more

African Elephant Imports on a Case-by-Case Basis Approved

As part of the permitting process, the Fish and Wildlife Service reviews each application received for import of such trophies and evaluates the information provided in the application as well as other information available to the Service as to the status of and management program for the species or population to ensure that the program is promoting the conservation of the species.

Read the entire memo here:

AIA/DMA/BOP/Animal Species Memorandum To: Assistant Director, International Affairs, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servic From: Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ,  Date: March 1, 2018 Subject: Withdrawal of Certain Findings for ESA-listed Species Taken as Sporthunted Trophies.

In response to the D.C. Circuit Court’s opinion in Safari Club Int’!, et al. v. Zinke, et al., No. 16-5358 (D.C. Cir., Dec. 22, 2017), the Service hereby withdraws, effective immediately, the 2014 and 2015 Endangered Species Act (ESA) enhancement findings for trophies of African elephants taken in Zimbabwe.

The findings are no longer effective for making individual permit determinations for imports of sport-hunted African elephant trophies.

Consistent with this approach, the Service hereby also withdraws, effective immediately, the following findings: ESA enhancement findings for trophies of African elephants taken in Zimbabwe signed in 1997 and 2017; ESA enhancement finding for trophies of lions taken in Zimbabwe signed in 2017; ESA enhancement findings signed in 1997, 2014, and 2015, and CITES non-detriment findings signed in 2014, 2015, and 2017 for trophies of African elephants taken in Tanzania; ESA enhancement finding for trophies of African elephants taken in South Africa signed in 1995; ESA enhancement finding for trophies of bontebok taken in South Africa signed in 1997; ESA enhancement findings for trophies of lions taken in South Africa signed in 2016 and 2017; ESA enhancement finding for trophies of African elephants taken in Botswana signed in 1997; ESA enhancement finding for trophies of African elephants taken in Namibia signed in 1995; ESA enhancement finding for trophies of African elephants taken in Zambia signed in 2012; ESA enhancement finding for trophies of lions taken in Zambia signed in 2017; and the ESA enhancement and CITES non-detriment findings for trophies of African elephants taken in Zambia signed in 2017.

All of the above referenced findings are no longer effective for making individual permit determinations for imports of those spo11-hunted ESA-listed species. However, the Service intends to use the information cited in these findings and contained in its files as appropriate, in addition to the information it receives and has available when it receives each application, to evaluate individual permit applications.

The Service is continuing to monitor the status and management of these species in their range countries. At this time, when the Service processes these permit applications, the Service intends to do so on an individual basis, including making ESA enhancement determinations, and CITES non-detriment determinations when required, for each application. The Service intends to grant or deny permits to import a sport-hunted trophy on a case-by-case basis pursuant to its authorities under the ESA and CITES. As part of the permitting process, the Service reviews each application received for import of such trophies and evaluates the information provided in the application as well as other information available to the Service as to the status of and management program for the species or population to ensure that the program is promoting the conservation of the species. Each application must also meet all other applicable permitting requirements before it may be authorized.

1 129 130 131 132 133 383