Stealth Cam Presents New G34 Pro


Stealth Cam®, introduced in the year 2000, quickly became the leader in scouting camera innovation. Continuing to advance technology to the next level, Stealth Cam® introduces the new G34 Pro.The G34 Pro is 10% smaller in size than the original G series, and features a textured housing with rub to help blend in with its surroundings. Some of the more notable improvements include an adjustable PIR sensor that allows the camera to sense out to 100 feet, as well as security mode with SD card overwriting. Security mode ensures your card will never fill up and stop working, rather retaining the most recent information the SD card capacity can hold. Read more

DNR begins new elk tracking research project in the northern Lower Peninsula

GW:  Check out the netting operation video farther down the page.

An elk lies in the snow, covered by a net that just fell from the sky.

A “mugger” jumps out of a helicopter, while a ground team moves in.

This is net-gunning – a process the Michigan Department of Natural Resources used recently in the northern Lower Peninsula to fit 40 elk with GPS collars.

The DNR and Michigan State University are jointly funding this new tracking project, which is being researched by an MSU graduate student.

A bull elk runs away from a DNR researcher in a snowy setting in the northern Lower Peninsula.Across the country, wildlife research biologists are interested in the combination of wild animals and human activities.

“One of the goals of this project is to look specifically at the effects of recreation in the core elk range by tracking elk movements over the next three years,” said Brian Mastenbrook, DNR wildlife field operations manager.

Michigan’s core elk range includes the Pigeon River Country State Forest, which encompasses more than 100,000 acres of public land northeast of Gaylord in Otsego and Cheboygan counties.

The elk here, reintroduced to the area in the early 1900s, represent the largest wild elk population east of the Mississippi River.

This tracking research project had been in the works since 2006 and was identified by the DNR’s Elk Management Advisory Team as a subject to be analyzed.

“In the early 1980s, our research looked at the effects of oil and gas development. In the late 1980s, we looked at how hunting affected elk behavior within the elk range,” said DNR wildlife research biologist Dean Beyer. “Now as time has passed, we face new issues. This research is designed to look at elk habitat and how elk move in relation to human activities, specifically horseback and mountain bike riding.”

The net-gunning capture effort began Feb. 14 with a safety meeting of DNR staff, Michigan State University researchers and a helicopter flight crew from Texas. In all, about two dozen people were involved with the process.

With multiple aircraft, ground crews and live animals involved, clear and reliable communication was needed. Also, the elk would not be tranquilized, making this collaring effort unique.

Researchers are grouped around an elk that is lying in the snow. They work to fit the animal with a GPS collar before release.“Not tranquilizing an animal changes the ground game in this collaring. We are handling large animals, fully aware and capable of moving, so we need to move quickly,” Beyer said. “The elk can then be back on their way and return to their natural setting. Fortunately, we have highly qualified and experienced staff to make this happen.”

An adult Michigan elk can stand up to 5 feet tall at its shoulder and weigh up to 900 pounds. The male, or bull, elk hadn’t dropped their antlers at the time of collaring, adding sharp-polished bone, weighing up to 40 pounds, into the safety equation.

Crews in two DNR airplanes, looking down from low altitude, had no problem locating groups of the large elk against the white, snowy backdrop.

“It’s like hunting for morel mushrooms,” said DNR wildlife technician Mark Monroe. “Just like morels, if one elk is spotted, typically others can be found – because elk are a social animal.”

Monroe was leading the ground team of multiple snowmobiles that were in constant radio communication with the two airplanes and the helicopter.

“The plane would alert us to the number of elk they’d spotted, their location and if they were males or females,” Monroe said. “The best reports were multiple elk near a clearing – which is great, because we need the room to work.”

The helicopter crew and the ground team would develop their plan – the route, number of elk and which team would go where.

Ground teams would then head in on snowmobiles.

Timing was important. They couldn’t go in before the elk were netted or they would risk scaring away the big animals.

Guided by crew in the twA helicopter moves in on a group of elk in a snow-covered field in the Lower Peninsula.o DNR airplanes, the helicopter would fly low to herd the elk into a safe position for capture.

The net-gun was then fired from the helicopter to capture the elk.

The “mugger” is the first person to get out of the helicopter once the elk is netted. Muggers hold the net until others arrive.

Experienced handlers immediately place a blindfold on the captured elk and secure the legs with hobbles, which are small belt-like straps.

Meanwhile, other members of the team start to remove the tangled bright orange net from the captured elk.

Now, the crew will fit the elk with a GPS tracking collar. The collar sends signals to satellites, providing researchers with information about the elk’s movements and location at any given time.

The collar is designed to fall off after three years, eliminating the need for researchers to handle the elk again. If elk movement isn’t observed, a distress signal will be sent.

The entire collaring process can take a three-person ground team about 10 to 15 minutes.

When the team’s work is complete, the elk is released by first removing the hobbles and then the blindfold, allowing the elk to immediately run off on its own.

During this February outing, the collaring team worked out of the DNR’s Atlanta field office. The team met its goal in just two days – 20 male and 20 female elk fitted with GPS tracking collars.

“We are very excited about how quickly we were able to complete this collaring mission,” Mastenbrook said. “Although the project development itself was years in the making.”

Recently, elk population estimates were made during an airplane survey.

video still showing elk viewed from helicopterDNR staff flew over the Michigan elk core area for nine days and observed 1,002 elk situated within 88 transects they flew. This aerial survey not only provided population estimates, but also showed the location of elk and the proportion of males to females.

“As responsible managers of natural resources, we need to understand what, if any, effects recreation has on our elk,” Mastenbrook said. “We are managing wildlife for all of the people of the state of Michigan. This type of research gives us information that helps us make the right management decisions.”

Check out a video of the elk capture efforts in northern Michigan.

To learn more about Michigan’s elk populations visit www.michigan.gov/elk.

Coyote Control: When Is It The Right Option?

Coyote Control: When Is It The Right Option?

Editor’s Note: This is an excerpt from a longer article that was first seen by QDMA members in Quality Whitetails magazine. To start receiving our magazine, become a member of QDMA today.

On a crisp, clear November night at deer camp, the conversation around the campfire subsides for a moment as you add another log to the fire. Just as you ease back into your camp chair, the silence is broken by a long mournful howl. Its maker is soon joined by what sounds like a dozen other coyotes, each making their own yips, barks and howls.

This scenario, once unusual or even rare across much of the eastern United States, has now become common. As deer hunters, it’s natural for us to want to do something about it.

Given our current knowledge of coyote predation on deer, when is coyote control justified? The answer depends on where your current management program is in relation to the Four Cornerstones of QDM. Read more

10 Stats From New Deer Research

By Lindsay Thomas

10 Stats From New Deer ResearchI’m just back from one of my favorite hunting trips of the year, one where I never do any actual hunting. It’s the annual meeting of the Southeast Deer Study Group, a two-day barrage of 36 PowerPoint presentations and 20 poster-board exhibits updating the latest in whitetail science and management issues. This is a gathering of professional wildlife biologists, professors and college students from all over the country (not just the Southeast), and though they are almost all deer hunters, at this meeting they speak to each other in the language of science. Over the years I’ve attended, I’ve learned to translate jargon like “spatio-temporal” (space and time), “neonates” (fawns), “hazard ratio” (risk level), “mortality event” (it died), and “Bayesian framework” (actually, still no clue on this one). This is how I knew a presentation on Spatio-Temporal Individual Specialization of Mature Male White-Tailed Deer was likely to be far more cool than its title.

QDMA attends this annual meeting to listen in, translate, and then provide deer hunters with the most useful and interesting information. There were several noteworthy presentations at the 2016 meeting, and we’ll be talking about some of them in more detail in coming issues of Quality Whitetails magazine. To make sure you receive them, become a QDMA member today. For now, here are 10 snapshots of data I gathered for you.

Read more

Biologists conducting U.P. wolf survey, DNR supporting efforts to return wolf management to Michigan

On a snow-swept back road in Delta County, a Michigan Department of Natural Resources wildlife biologist drives his vehicle slowly. Watching out his windows, he scans each set of animal tracks he sees pushed into the fresh snow.

Among the footprints left by bobcats, white-tailed deer, snowshoe hare and other animals, he’s looking for the large-pawed tracks of gray wolves, laid out in a path down the road or into the woods.

Discovering wolf tracks – and then following them for long distances – helps biologists estimate population size and delineate where, and how, wolf packs are spending their time this winter.

Population dynamics

Originally native to Michigan, wolves had all but vanished from the Upper Peninsula – not including Isle Royale – by the early 1960s. This occurred through hunter bounties and as white-tailed deer populations declined.

A wildlife management specialist looks at a set of coyote tracks in the fresh snow on a road in Delta County.Michigan protected wolves as endangered species in 1965. Federal protections were solidified under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

As neighboring Wisconsin’s wolf population began to rebound during the 1970s, reports of lone wolf sightings increased in the U.P. Biologists confirmed a pair of wolves in the central U.P. in the late 1980s, a union that produced pups in 1991.

Since the winter of 1993-94, combined wolf numbers in Michigan and Wisconsin have surpassed 100, meeting federally established goals for population recovery. The Michigan goal of a minimum sustainable population of 200 wolves for five consecutive years also was achieved.

From 1994 to 2003, the U.P. wolf population saw an average annual growth rate of 19 percent. Growth shrunk to 12 percent as the wolf population neared the maximum level the U.P. could sustain – the biological carrying capacity.

Since 2011, wolf population estimates have not changed significantly. The DNR’s most recent minimum estimate of the U.P. wolf population was 636, issued in spring 2014.

A new DNR wolf survey began in December. No preliminary results are available yet, but a new minimum population estimate is expected in April.

Biologists are surveying wolf populations in some areas and extrapolating that data to estimate the number of wolves across the region.

“As we’ve done over the past few years, to reduce staff effort and expense, a stratified sampling method is being used to carry out the survey throughout the Upper Peninsula,” said Kevin Swanson, a wildlife management specialist with the DNR’s bear and wolf program. “We are now more than halfway through that survey period.”

During February, survey biologists began looking for signs of breeding exhibited by scent marking and blood in urine, which indicates a female wolf may be in estrus (heat).

“Based on the wolf sign I am finding while searching for packs in central and southern Marquette County, northern Menominee and northern Delta counties, I do not anticipate any drastic fluctuations in wolf abundance in that particular area,” Swanson said. “But results may vary significantly in other parts of the U.P.”

The migration of deer from the northern to the southern parts of the U.P. was postponed by several weeks thisA dark-colored wolf walks through the woods in the Upper Peninsula. winter, which has been comparatively milder than the past three.

“The delayed deer migration is now over in many areas so we will focus more of our survey efforts in deer yarding complexes, places where wolves frequent to prey on deer,” Swanson said.

In the Lower Peninsula, over the past few years, there have been persistent reports of sightings, tracks and other evidence of wolves.

In March 2014, biologists with the Little Traverse Band of Odawa Indians discovered tracks and collected scat from what was presumed to be a wolf in Emmet County. DNR biologists also visited the site.

In September 2015, confirmation was received from Trent University in Peterborough, Ontario, that the Emmet County scat submitted for DNR analysis was from a male gray wolf. This marked the second confirmation of wolf presence in the Lower Peninsula since 1910. The first occurred in 2004 when a wolf collared by the DNR in Mackinac County was caught and accidentally killed by a coyote trapper in Presque Isle County.

The DNR’s ongoing wolf track surveys are conducted only in the U.P. Wolf reports in the Lower Peninsula continue to be investigated.

Legal challenges

In January 2012, citing wolf recovery in the region, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service took gray wolves off the federal endangered species list in Michigan and Wisconsin and the threatened species list in Minnesota.

“Gray wolves are thriving in the Great Lakes region, and their successful recovery is a testament to the hard  work of the Service and our state and local partners,” Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe said at the time. “We are confident state and tribal wildlife managers in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin will effectively manage healthy wolf populations now that federal protection is no longer needed.”

The ruling allowed Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin to manage wolves according to their wolf management plans. Michigan’s plan was crafted with the help of a panel representing a wide span of interests ranging from Native American tribes to trappers, hunters and environmentalists.

The 1997 plan, which was updated in 2008 and 2015, allowed for lethal means to control a limited number of wolves each year where conflicts had occurred. Michigan law allowed citizens to kill wolves that were actively preying on their hunting dogs or livestock.

However, Michigan’s laws on wolf depredation and the ability of wildlife managers to use lethal means, includingThree wolves are shown on a trail in an aerial photo of a snow-covered landscape in the Upper Peninsula. hunting, to control wolves was suspended in December 2014, after a ruling from the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

In a lawsuit challenging the federal delisting, the court ruling found in favor of the Humane Society of the United States, ordering wolves returned to federal protection. Wolves have since remained classified as endangered species in Michigan and Wisconsin and threatened in Minnesota.

Because of the federal endangered species status, wolves may legally be killed in Michigan only in defense of human life.

After the court’s finding, Michigan, Wisconsin, some private groups and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service appealed the decision, filing their initial legal briefs in the case late last year.

“In over a decade of litigating about delisting the gray wolf, this is the first time the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been willing to bring an appeal,” said Trevor VanDyke, director of the DNR’s Legislative and Legal Affairs Office in Lansing. Read more

Time To Stop Pruning Oaks

Spring weather seems to be here a bit early this year and according to the Department of Natural Resources, that means it’s time to finish pruning oak trees to prevent the spread of oak wilt.

The best way to prevent the spread of oak wilt is to not prune any oaks between the end of March and the beginning of October. However, with the recent warm weather conditions, property owners should finish pruning oaks by the middle of March. Read more

Relaxing Michigan’s Coyote Regulations

By Glen Wunderlich

When a Shelby Township, MI woman let her Pomeranian mix dog outside before retiring for the night, it would be the last time she would see her family pet alive. In another incident in Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, a miniature Schnauser spent his last minutes on a leash in front of his home. And, in the sanctuary of a fenced-in backyard in Hacienda Heights, California, a Papillion mix family pet met its fate. The common denominator? Coyote attacks.

As coyote numbers have increased, so have deadly encounters in urban settings. Because of the secretive nature of coyotes, many folks are oblivious to their existence until we hear of such horrific acts of terror.

In an ongoing study of predators in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula by Mississippi State University, 142 fawns were radio-collared and coyotes were found to be responsible for 26 of 53 deaths – as many as bobcats, wolves, bears, and bald eagles combined.

Coyotes are found throughout Michigan in both rural and urban areas.  With an increase in complaints from the public regarding coyotes, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) believes that an expansion of the opportunities to take coyotes may help reduce these concerns.

The DNR has recommended several coyote hunting regulation changes to the Natural Resources Commission, including year-round hunting opportunities and implementation of a Michigan United Conservation Clubs (MUCC) and Michigan Trappers and Predator Callers Association resolution to allow the use of #3 and #4 buckshot at night for coyotes.

The DNR held discussions with internal staff and many external stakeholders to develop recommendations to amend our state’s Wildlife Conservation Order.  The amendment would include expanding the coyote season statewide, year round, along with clarifying nighttime hunting of furbearers, and to expand the time frame in which nighttime hunting with artificial lights may occur.  The Department is also giving a recommendation to expand allowable ammunition for taking all furbearers which may be hunted at night to include both 3 and number 4 buckshot.

Michigan’s current coyote regulations include daytime coyote hunting from July 15th to April 15th which is a liberal season with a few minor restrictions on the methods of take, devices, and ammunition. The current season for nighttime coyote hunting is from October 15th to March 31st.  However, the nighttime coyote hunting season is a restricted season with limited methods of take, devices and ammunition.  Individuals must possess a fur-harvester or resident base license.  Throughout the entire year, individuals may take a coyote on private property if the coyote is causing or about to cause damage.

Several other proposed resolutions by MUCC that would not become MUCC policy unless adopted at its Annual Convention are as follows:

Coyote Bounty (Straits Area Sportsmens Club) | Reverse MUCC’s opposition to bounties and institute a coyote bounty.

Nighttime Predator Hunting with Centerfire Firearms (Chris Kettler, Michigan Trappers and Predator Callers Association) | Remove restriction on using centerfire firearms for nighttime predator hunting.

Any type of coyote control is difficult but removing some of the encumbrances to willing sportsmen may be the best option available to wildlife managers.  It’s past time that we quit protecting the varmints that are helping to reduce our declining deer herd.

Squirrel Hunting for the Birds

GW: Today, Alabama’s Dave Rainer takes us on a decidedly different kind of squirrel hunt.

Boy, did I go on a fantastic squirrel hunt last weekend in the Grampian Hills outside Camden, Alabama. Our hunting party bagged a grand total of two squirrels.

Say what? Two squirrels are barely enough to make a small pot of squirrel and dumplings.

What made it such an enjoyable, eye-opening hunt was the method by which the squirrels were taken – red-tailed hawks.

That’s right, the Alabama Hawking Association (AHA) held its annual meet last weekend, and its members brought a variety of hawks to the event with red-tailed hawks the most common bird of prey.

The meet attracted falconers (the generic term for those who hunt with raptors) not only from Alabama but all around the Southeast. One participant escaped the Michigan snow to travel to Alabama.

The 70-plus participants in the meet were divided into manageable groups and turned loose on property donated for the hunts.

I accompanied a group of falconers from around the Southeast from Georgia to Mississippi to Tennessee, although the Tennessean (Jeff Fincher) had roots in Eutaw, Alabama.

The hunting method involved heading into the woods and shaking vines and saplings to get a squirrel to reveal its location. At that point, the handler for the bird designated for that hunt released the raptor.

Larry Mullis’ red-tailed hawk, named Dixie, soars through the treetops to find a perch suitable for attacking a gray squirrel’s hideout (Above). After several attempts, Dixie pinned the squirrel, hidden inside a patch of Spanish moss, to the oak tree. All photos by Dave Rainer with permission.

On the first hunt of the morning, Larry Mullis of Eastman, Georgia, released Dixie, his year-old female red-tailed hawk after a squirrel was seen scurrying up a tall oak.

With eyesight so acute that the most common analogy used is it could read newspaper headlines at a quarter of a mile, the bird started a methodical stalk of the gray squirrel. Dixie flew from limb to limb in the surrounding tree until she was in an advantageous attack position. The falconers call it “laddering.”

With a leap from her perch, Dixie sailed toward the squirrel’s hideout Read more

Tracking wildlife is a fun, educational winter activity

At this point in the winter, many Michiganders might start feeling a little cooped up.

One way to beat cabin fever – and get mind and body active – is to become a nature detective and learn more about the wildlife in your own backyard or neighborhood.

While it can be fun year-round, looking for clues to wildlife activity is especially interesting in the winter when animal tracks are easily visible in the snow.

“Tracks can tell a story,” said Hannah Schauer, wildlife education technician for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. “If you find a trail of footprints, you may want to follow it to get a glimpse inside the animal’s life.”

Deer, rabbits, squirrels and foxes are just a few examples of animals whose tracks you may come across.

Schauer recommends a few tools that can help in the quest for tracks, including a good field guide.

Imprints from bird feathers are seen in the snow where animal tracks end.“There is a variety of wildlife tracking and identification guidebooks available – find one that you like and have it handy on a hike to help you determine whose tracks you have spotted,” she said.

Other helpful items to carry along are a camera, a ruler, a key or coins to put next to the track for size reference when taking a photo, a notepad and pencil for sketching tracks and making notes on other observations about the animal’s trail, and binoculars. Read more

Statement of the Boone and Crockett Club on Yellowstone Grizzly Delisting

MISSOULA, Mont. – We welcome today’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposal to return the Yellowstone grizzly bear to state management as a recovered species. Restoring the bear to this point is a high achievement of state, federal, and tribal experts working together since the 1980s, and we commend especially the Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee for a job well done.

The strong biological evidence that Yellowstone grizzly bears are recovered clearly justifies today’s proposal, and we will join in the process of reviewing the proposal for certainty that recovery will hold before a final delisting decision is made.

We will work closely with other conservation leaders to insist on continued interagency cooperation that sustains a stable grizzly population, manages conflicts between bears and people, and employs ethical, scientifically-regulated hunting to the extent that it serves management goals and promotes respect for the grizzly and its conservation.

1 196 197 198 199 200 356