Reckless Lawsuits Against Firearm Industry Members SB 318

Please Call Your State Senator Today!

SB 318 maliciously targets responsible, law-abiding firearm retailers and manufacturers with frivolous litigation intended to bankrupt and destroy them. This legislation opens all firearm industry members to “fishing expeditions” under the Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA) initiated by politically-motivated advocacy organizations and attorneys. Punitive damage awards for a violation are increased from $300 to a minimum of $250,000 (an 83,000% increase), but only for firearm industry members. Other industries will see penalties increase from $300 to $10,000 (a 3,200% increase).

Provisions & Concerns Include:

  • Proponents deceptively claim this legislation pursues firearm industry members who violate laws and who refuse to change heavily-regulated practices to somehow counter criminal conduct such as converting semiautomatic firearms to fully-automatic firearms. In truth, SB 318 will be used against all lawful firearm businesses that advertise in any manner in New Mexico because of the vague, subjective nature of the UTPA and dramatically increased potential winnings.
  • Incredibly, a violation of the UTPA includes any advertisement or statement that “may” or “tends to” be misleading. An ad that simply states that a modern firearm is “safe” or “effective” for self-defense is likely to trigger a suit because opponents of firearm ownership regularly claim that firearms are neither safe nor effective. Currently, maximum awards under the UTPA are set between $100 and $300. The vague law has not been a problem to date because there has been no financial incentive to abuse it.
  • Authorizes any citizen merely “aware of” a suspected violation of the UTPA to file an action against a member of the firearm industry (someone who has seen or heard an ad and disagrees with it). This is intended to allow advocacy groups like Giffords Law Center to encourage their members to pile on any claimed violation. In order to sue any other industry in the state, plaintiffs must show that they have been harmed in some manner.
  • Removes any disincentive against filing frivolous claims. SB 318 effectively eliminates the possibility that defendants will be awarded court costs and attorney fees if they prevail.

Take Action: Read more

SAF Files Response Brief with SCOTUS in Minnesota Carry Case

Attorneys representing the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners, in a case challenging the State of Minnesota’s prohibition on licensed concealed carry by young adults ages 18-20, have filed a response brief with the U.S. Supreme Court encouraging the justices to “grant plenary review and set the case for argument.”

The case is known as Jacobson v. Worth, originally filed in June 2021 as Worth v. Harrington. SAF is joined by the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, Firearms Policy Coalition, and three private citizens, Kristin Worth, for whom the case is named, Austin Dye, and Axel Anderson. While all three have turned 21, the Eighth Circuit Court granted a motion to supplement the record and allow another individual, Joe Knudsen, to carry the complaint. They are represented by attorneys David H. Thompson, Peter A. Patterson, John D. Ohlendorf and William V. Bergstrom at Cooper & Kirk in Washington, D.C.

SAF won this case at trial and at the appeals court level. Minnesota is appealing the ruling.

“Today’s filing is unique in that we are agreeing with Minnesota’s request in asking the Supreme Court to hear our case to resolve a dispute between the circuits,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut. “The lower courts are not unanimous in their approach to the Second Amendment rights of 18-20-year-olds. It is important that the Court weigh in to confirm that 18-20-year-olds are part of ‘the People’ and the Second Amendment applies in full to those individuals. The ban Minnesota seeks to uphold eviscerates the right of those adults to be able to carry a firearm for self-defense. This is patently unconstitutional and while we prevailed at the court of appeals, the Supreme Court needs to ensure all the lower courts reach the proper result. By taking this case, they can do just that.” Read more

Maryland Alert: Lead Ammunition Ban Bills

Contact Your Senator and Delegate Today and Urge Them to Oppose These Bans!

This session, the Maryland General Assembly is considering two bills that will ban the use of traditional lead ammunition for hunting throughout the state.

Senate Bill 634 and House Bill 741 will phase out the use of traditional lead ammunition for hunting by 2029. These bills use a species-based phase-out scheme that does not consider the current and future availability of lead alternatives. In fact, the bills are being pushed by anti-hunting groups that want to ban hunting all together.

Currently, both these bills are sitting in their respective committees awaiting committee votes. The deadline to report these bills favorably is quickly approaching as the bill crossover date is March 17. This is the day each chamber sends to the other chamber those bills it intends to pass favorably.

Please take action by contacting your senator and delegate. Respectfully ask them to oppose these bans. Instead of a ban, ask them to support voluntary measures that encourage hunters to try some of the new, non-lead products available on the market. The ultimate decision should be left up to hunters themselves and not mandated by the state. You can find your legislator by clicking here.

FPC Defends Victory in New York Firearm Carry Ban Lawsuit

NEW YORK – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that it filed its answering brief with the federal Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Christian v. James, an FPC Law case that challenges New York’s laws banning firearms on all publicly accessible private property without the express consent of the owner.

These accelerated appellate proceedings closely follow the Western District of New York’s judgment in favor of the FPC plaintiffs just two months ago in January. This brief can be viewed at firearmspolicy.org/boron.

New York’s ban “implicates the plain text of the Second Amendment by regulating where firearms may lawfully be carried. And it cannot be reconciled with the historic principles underlying the Second Amendment,” argues the brief. “This Court already has held that the State is unlikely to be able to justify the law historically. The Court should now hold that its prediction was correct.”

“We are committed to putting an end to this immoral and unconstitutional law, whatever it takes, and this brief is an important step to that end,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “This outrageous regulatory scheme simply cannot pass constitutional muster and the Second Circuit should hold as much without delay.” Read more

Biden Holdovers at DOJ Move to Stall GOA Victory in Lawsuit Against ATF

Gun Owners of America (GOA) and Gun Owners Foundation (GOF), alongside the states of Texas, Louisiana, Utah and Mississippi have filed an opposition to the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) motion to stay our ongoing lawsuit against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The case, which seeks to block the Biden Administration’s unlawful “engaged in the business” rule, had already seen a victory at the lower court, where a judge granted a preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs. But now, the DOJ is attempting to stall the case by asking for a stay, which could delay a resolution for an indefinite period of time.

In our response filed today, GOA and the Texas Attorney General’s office made it clear that the DOJ’s request to stay the case only serves to further entrench the issue in a “quagmire of administrative process and serial litigation.” As the case is now on the brink of resolution, the DOJ’s actions seek to prolong the legal uncertainty, making it harder for gun owners to defend their rights.

The DOJ’s request to stall this victory is not only baseless but also indicative of the entrenched anti-gun agenda within DOJ’s bureaucracy.

This legal battle is part of a larger fight to protect the Second Amendment rights of all Americans. GOA and the Texas Attorney General’s office are working tirelessly to ensure that the ATF’s overreach is held in check, demanding that the DOJ cease its efforts to derail the court from deciding our case. On the campaign trail, President Trump said: “Biden is trying to ban all private gun transfers in the United States with a stroke of a pen. Under a Trump administration, all of those Biden disasters get ripped up and torn out my first week.” Read more

Contact Governor Youngkin Today and Oppose The Antigun and Anti-industry Bills

On Saturday, February 22, the Virginia General Assembly adjourned sine die from its 2025 legislative session. Like last year, Democrats in both the Senate and House passed a plethora of antigun and anti-industry bills that, if signed, will negatively affect manufacturers, retailers and consumers. Governor Glenn Youngkin, like last year, has indicated that he will not sign bills that unjustly attack the industry and penalize individuals that choose to exercise their Second Amendment rights. Please contact Governor Youngkin’s office and let him know you appreciate him standing in support of the industry.

Industry Specific Bills passed this year include: Read more

GOA & GOF Filed Reply Brief in NY Court to Expand Victory from NYC to Statewide Access for Nonresident Concealed Carry

GW: “…unconstitutional restrictions on nonresidents seeking to carry concealed firearms in public for self-defense.”

Washington, D.C. — Gun Owners of America (GOA) and Gun Owners Foundation (GOF), on behalf of Carl Higbie and two other plaintiffs, have filed an Opposition to New York’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment in the Northern District of New York, responding to the state’s defense of restrictive concealed carry permit laws. Our work here aims to expand the victory previously won when New York City began to allow nonresidents to apply for permits to the entire state of New York, removing the current barriers that confine nonresident concealed carry access to just New York City.

This legal action is part of our ongoing commitment to dismantle unconstitutional gun laws that restrict the rights of law-abiding citizens across the country. We argue that New York’s current laws violate the Second and Fourteenth Amendments by imposing unconstitutional restrictions on nonresidents seeking to carry concealed firearms in public for self-defense.

The state’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment focused on saying first, that New York does not prohibit nonresident permit applications, and second, defending local regulations that limit nonresidents’ ability to apply for permits to carry firearms in the state. We countered with a powerful response, reaffirming that New York’s restrictive policies infringe upon the fundamental right to self-defense and are out of step with state and federal law and the rest of the country.

Erich Pratt, GOA’s Senior Vice President, issued the following statement:

“Our rights, protected by the Constitution, aren’t up for debate—period. We are not backing down in our fight against New York’s unconstitutional policies. GOA and GOF will continue to fight to ensure that the Second Amendment rights of all Americans, including nonresidents, are upheld. We will not rest until every law-abiding citizen is free to exercise their constitutional right to carry a firearm for self-defense, wherever they are.”

Sam Paredes, on behalf of Gun Owners Foundation, added: Read more

NSSF Urges ATF to Heed Senators’ Call to Kill Unlawful Gun Control Regulations

“…shall not be infringed.”

WASHINGTON, D.C. — NSSF®, The Firearm Industry Trade Association, urges the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to heed the call by U.S. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and 29 other U.S. Senators to quickly act on President Donald Trump’s Executive Order to review and roll back unconstitutional gun control regulations and rules that were levied on the firearm industry by the previous White House administration.

A letter, sent to Marvin G. Richardson, ATF Deputy Director, specifically called on the agency to formally end the “engaged-in-the-business” rule, the pistol-brace rule, the “ghost gun” rule and ATF’s “zero tolerance” policy that has forced small business firearm retailers to lose or surrender their licenses for minor clerical errors discovered during inspections.

“The previous administration wielded the ATF like a hammer and anvil against the firearm industry, turning the regulatory agency into one that punished and carried out a radical gun control agenda designed to diminish Second Amendment rights. President Donald Trump – along with Senator John Cornyn and these dozens of other senators – are righting the ship and returning ATF to its mandated role as a law enforcement agency focused on combatting violent crime and to act as a non-partisan regulator of the firearm industry,” said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel. “The rules specifically identified by the senators were designed to punish the firearm industry and usher in gun control outside of the legislative process. NSSF has protested these rules ever since they were announced and is heartened that the Trump administration and the Senate is acting quickly to protect Second Amendment rights and the lawful firearm industry. NSSF encourages ATF to act quickly on Senator Cornyn’s letter and enact these reforms to roll back unconstitutional overreaches brought by the Biden administration.”

In addition to urging the ATF to roll back the punishing and unconstitutional measures, the Senate letter urges ATF to “immediately destroy the hundreds of millions of ATF Form 4473 firearm transaction records and other licensee records that are over 20 years old. These records have no particular law enforcement value but do contain the sensitive information of millions of law-abiding gun owners.”

NSSF concurs with this request as those two-decade-old background check forms hold little value providing actionable law enforcement leads to solve crimes. This action would ensure gun owners’ privacy is protected and reduce administrative burdens to firearm trace requests. Prior to the Biden administration, federal firearm licenses were not required to retain these records after 20 years.

Only Congress Can Enact Federal Legislation, FPC Groups Argue in Supreme Court Brief

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced the filing of a brief with the United States Supreme Court in the case of FCC v. Consumers’ Research, which is set to address the question of when and how Congress may delegate its authority to administrative agencies. The brief can be viewed at FPCLaw.org.

“Amici have a particular interest in this case for two reasons. Amici litigate cases in federal court around the country, and the question added by the Court concerning the availability of mootness exceptions is of great importance to Amici,” the brief explains, as “firearms cases frequently risk becoming moot, and the contours of the mootness doctrine are thus extremely important to Amici. Of even greater import to Amici is reigning in unconstitutional delegations of legislative power. Individual liberty, including the right to keep and bear arms, is routinely violated under the guise of broad delegations to administrative agencies.”

“The Supreme Court should affirm the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in this case and make clear that only Congress can make federal law,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “Congress may not continue to unconstitutionally delegate its law-making power to federal agencies like the ATF to abuse peaceable gun owners throughout the United States.”

“This case presents the Supreme Court with an opportunity to correct course and restore the protections that are inherent in the Constitution through our Nation’s separation of powers,” said FPC Action Foundation President Cody J. Wisniewski. Read more

GOA, GOF, & Allies File Reply Brief in Challenge to Tenn. Restrictions on Public Firearm Carry

GW:  Can’t believe Tennessee can be this restrictive.  “…Tennessee’s laws lack historical precedent…”  

Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners Foundation, & Allies File Reply Brief in Challenge to Tennessee’s Unconstitutional Restrictions on Public Firearm Carry

Washington, D.C. — Gun Owners of America (GOA), together with Gun Owners Foundation (GOF) and individual plaintiffs, have filed a reply brief in their ongoing challenge to Tennessee’s unconstitutional restrictions on carrying firearms in public. The case, filed in the Chancery Court for the State of Tennessee, 28th Judicial District, Gibson County, seeks to have Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-17-1307(a) and 39-17-1311(a) declared unconstitutional for criminalizing the public carry of firearms.

Tennessee’s laws impose broad restrictions on carrying firearms in public spaces, such as parks, effectively criminalizing the right to self-defense. In our reply brief, we argue that these laws violate both the Second Amendment and Article I, Section 26 of the Tennessee Constitution, which protects the right to bear arms. We assert that these statutes improperly treat the right to bear arms as an affirmative defense, rather than fully protecting the constitutional right to self-defense in public.

We also contend that Tennessee’s laws lack historical precedent and fail to meet the standards set by recent Supreme Court rulings, such as Bruen, which require a historical analysis to determine the constitutionality of modern firearm regulations. Specifically, we challenge Tennessee’s argument that public places, like parks and polling stations, can be designated as “sensitive places” where gun rights can be restricted. We reject these claims, noting that such restrictions are inconsistent with the Nation’s historical tradition surrounding the right to bear arms.

The Court will likely schedule a hearing in the near future. GOA, GOF, and our allies are seeking a court order to invalidate these laws and restore the full right to carry firearms in public spaces, including parks, for self-defense purposes without the need for exceptions or affirmative defenses. Read more

1 2 3 4 5 150