Citizen-science data vital for breeding-bird studies

Ithaca, NY—Around the world, birds are building nests and raising families—even near homes, offices, or in local parks. Anyone who finds a bird’s nest can help scientists by reporting to the free NestWatch project at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. NestWatch collects, analyzes, and distributes data, serving as a warehouse of nesting bird information. NestWatchers, in turn, get to witness the start of new life and help to preserve it with their valuable information.

A NestWatcher reports a nest from a birdhouse in upstate New York. Photo by Chelsea Benson.

“Every year, scientists use data collected by NestWatchers in published studies,” says Robyn Bailey, NestWatch project leader. “For example, in 2018, two studies examined the effects of spring temperatures on the timing of nesting activities, and showed that birds nest earlier when spring temperatures are warmer. Such studies help add to our understanding of how climate change can affect the lives of birds.”

Those who find a nest can report its location, the species using it, number of eggs laid, and other important milestones as the adult birds incubate, raise, and fledge their young. The NestWatch website and mobile app now accept reports submitted from anywhere in the world, enabling scientists to compare birds across their global breeding range. Read more

As a part of a joint wildlife disease initiative, Michigan State University and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources are seeking grant proposals for collaborative research, education and outreach projects to address the most important issues around wildlife disease in Michigan, especially chronic wasting disease in deer.

“Michigan is not alone in this fight against CWD; many other states are trying to better understand these same issues,” said DNR Wildlife Chief Russ Mason. “Collaboration with other states and agencies that leverages available data, knowledge and programming to advance the rate of discovery and impact of work is encouraged.” Read more

Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. As spring nears, Michigan residents may occasionally see some smoke, courtesy of prescribed fires, or burns, carried out in different areas of the state by the DNR. They can be conducted any time of year, but most burns are done in the spring and fall.

The DNR works closely with local officials in areas where burns are planned. Weather is carefully monitored, too, and burns will be canceled if conditions are unfavorable.

These carefully staged fires help control invasive species and create critical habitat for wildlife. And, strange as it may sound, these fires also help our forests grow! Want to learn more? Check out the DNR’s Prescribed Fire Explained webpage for some history, a map of past burn locations, a link to a prescribed burn story map and the opportunity to sign up for email updates.

By Glen Wunderlich

The pending plan to manage the over-populated moose herd on Isle Royale National Park is to import wolves – including starving wolves from Canada that have wiped out an entire caribou herd already. There’s no doubt that wolves will do the dirty work of moose management by running the moose ragged and killing them off one by one. However, wolves don’t come with an off button. Saving moose from starvation only to have them eaten alive presents a dire future for not only the moose but also the wolves when they eat too much.

Although some 56 miles from the coast of Michigan, Isle Royale is part of Michigan. Treaties with the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community complicate management, because rights have been granted to the Indian Community to hunt and fish, and they would have the final word, if hunting were to be allowed.   And, if you haven’t guessed by now, that’s exactly what should be proposed in some manner.

One of the groups involved in this current experiment certainly has a dog in this fight, so to speak. The International Wolf Center (IWC) is a research and educational organization based in Ely, Minnesota, that, in its own words, “advances the survival of wolf populations.” This group and others have pledged $75,000 to airlift wolves to the island. The trouble is that some of the relocated wolves will die from the apparent trauma of being moved. Since the fall of 2018, two wolves died in the moving process, while another ran away on an “ice bridge” that developed in winter, thus wasting the money and effort.

Here’s a different approach. If we are going to inject wolves into the equation, then maybe we should think about a prescribed number of them. To keep them from running out of moose meat, they could be neutered first, thereby limiting their potential for over-killing.

In conjunction with the plan, hunters could be employed in strategic areas but would have the benefit of not only transportation to and from the island but also with assistance to haul out any animals taken – even if that means by helicopter, just as is done in rugged terrain in other parts of the world. Hunters would have two-way radios and units to communicate with officials to get the precious cargo handled safely.

To offset costs, hunters could apply for hunting tags through a lottery system with the cost of applications and actual license fees going to the effort’s expense similar to what Michigan does with its elk population. Unlike wolves, the number of moose taken could be strictly regulated. Plus, hunters could be required to take certain animals to balance the herd’s composition according to sound management principles. Wolves, on the other hand, are indiscriminate.

When hunting is dismissed out-of-hand, the dilemma presented to wildlife management gets complicated. Drastic and expensive endeavors always seem to be the only reasonable answer, just as it is with Ann Arbor’s deer over-population and controversial deer sterilization campaign. Ethical hunters can ease the pain and suffering of the moose and will pay for the privilege to become part of the management plan, if only given consideration.

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources has awarded a total of $100,000 in deer habitat improvement grant funding to a dozen entities for projects in the Upper Peninsula.

The Deer Habitat Improvement Partnership Initiative is a competitive grant program designed to enhance deer habitat on non-state lands in the Upper Peninsula.

“I think we have a good crop of projects this year, and some new partnership and project opportunities,” said Bill Scullon, DNR wildlife field operations manager and administrator for the grant initiative. “These projects will allow us to continue making deer habitat improvements on private lands, which is an important component of our Upper Peninsula deer management strategy.”

A 25 percent match is required for the projects, which allows the DNR to reach beyond the original grant investment to accomplish more important habitat work. Read more

DNR reports moose survey results to Michigan Natural Resources Commission

After this winter’s moose survey, wildlife biologists said the western Upper Peninsula moose population is growing at a long-term average of about 2 percent each year, with an estimated 509 animals living in that part of the state.

Michigan Natural Resources Wildlife Division Chief Russ Mason reported the survey results Thursday to the Michigan Natural Resources Commission at a regular NRC meeting at the Shanty Creek Resort in Bellaire.

“The growth rate for this moose population is low, but remains positive,” Mason said. “Moose are continuing to maintain a foothold in the western Upper Peninsula, continuing to further extend the lineage of a population airlifted to the area from Canada in the mid-1980s.” Read more

Except within its chronic wasting disease surveillance areas, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources has agreed to issue supplemental deer feeding permits in the southern part of the Upper Peninsula.

The action comes with average U.P. snow depths measured across the region nearly double that of a 15-year average for late February and March.

Feeding deer large quantities of food to supplement natural winter food resources – termed “supplemental feeding” – is allowed by permit in the northern U.P. counties beginning in January each year.

This type of feeding differs from “recreational feeding,” which is limited daily to 2 gallons of feed, placed within sight of a home or camp. Recreational feeding is allowed year-round across the U.P.

In southern U.P. counties – which typically exhibit milder winter weather conditions – free permits are issued for supplemental feeding dependent on weather conditions.

“The DNR uses total accumulated snow as an index of the severity of the winter,” said Terry Minzey, DNR U.P. regional wildlife supervisor. “In typical winters, impacts to the deer herd in the southern part of the region, based on snow accumulation measurements, can be forecasted by mid-January.” Read more