When Lead Meets Red Meat
GW: A strong consideration for copper alloy bullets and reasons why I prefer Barnes bullets with controlled expansion design. This article is from the Boone and Crockett Club.
Is using lead ammunition a human health hazard?
Excerpt from Fair Chase Magazine Winter 2024By Jim Heffelfinger, Professional Member, Photos Courtesy of Author
Illustration by Wyatt Heffelfinger
In recent years, agencies have been implementing regulatory bans and phase-outs of lead ammunition in some areas, and the messaging in these efforts—and in regulations—often warn hunters and their families about lead poisoning from eating animals shot with lead ammunition. But how much should hunters worry about the health effects of eating animals shot with lead ammo?
There are legitimate reasons hunters might choose alternative ammunition. Lead bullets can sicken or kill individual birds when they ingest lead fragments, which can cause localized effects to some species. For example, lead is no small issue for the recovery of endangered California condors where every individual is important, and agencies and organizations are addressing that threat. Hunters may want to take advantage of a clean wound channel and less meat loss when a shot didn’t go exactly as planned, or they may need a solid bullet for very large game where deep penetration and performance on big bones is important.
All these important and interconnected subtopics deserve their own discussions, but the broader subject is far too complex for one article. This issue of Fair Chase emphasizes the food value of hunting, so to allow for a meaningful discussion of human health and lead ammunition, we are focusing solely on that topic here. It is up to the reader to gather as much information as possible to inform and support your ammunition choices. Read more





